Magazine
By JESSICA BENKO | Mar 26th 2015
The goal of the Norwegian penal system is to get inmates out of it.
Prisons and Prisoners; Therapy and Rehabilitation; Sentences (Criminal)
"Much
of the backlash within penological circles can be traced to Robert
Martinson, a sociology researcher at the City University of New York. In
a 1974 article for the journal Public Interest, he summarized an
analysis of data from 1945 to 1967 about the impact of rehabilitation
programs on recidivism. Despite the fact that around half the individual
programs did show evidence of effectiveness in reducing recidivism,
Martinson’s article concluded that no category of rehabilitation program
(education or psychotherapy, for example) showed consistent results
across prison systems. “With few and isolated exceptions,” he wrote,
“the rehabilitative efforts that have been reported so far have had no
appreciable effect on recidivism.” Martinson’s paper was immediately
seized upon by the news media and politicians, who latched on to the
idea that “nothing works” in regard to prisoner rehabilitation. “It
Doesn’t Work” was the title of a “60 Minutes” segment on rehabilitation.
“They don’t rehabilitate, they don’t deter, they don’t punish and they
don’t protect,” Jerry Brown, the governor of California, said in a 1975
speech. A top psychiatrist for the Bureau of Prisons resigned in disgust
at what he perceived to be an abandonment of commitment to
rehabilitation. At the dedication ceremony for the San Diego M.C.C. in
1974, one of the very structures designed with rehabilitation in mind,
William Saxbe, the attorney general of the United States, declared that
the ability of a correctional program to produce rehabilitation was a
“myth” for all but the youngest offenders.
Martinson’s
paper was quickly challenged; a 1975 analysis of much of the same data
by another sociologist criticized Martinson’s choice to overlook the
successful programs and their characteristics in favor of a broad
conclusion devoid of context. By 1979, in light of new analyses,
Martinson published another paper that unequivocally withdrew his
previous conclusion, declaring that “contrary to my previous position,
some treatment programs do have an appreciable effect on
recidivism.” But by then, the “nothing works” narrative was firmly
entrenched. In 1984, a Senate report calling for more stringent
sentencing guidelines cited Martinson’s 1974 paper, without
acknowledging his later reversal. The tough-on-crime policies that
sprouted in Congress and state legislatures soon after included
mandatory minimums, longer sentences, three-strikes laws, legislation
allowing juveniles to be prosecuted as adults and an increase in
prisoners’ “maxing out,” or being released without passing through
reintegration programs or the parole system. Between 1975 and 2005, the
rate of incarceration in the United States skyrocketed, from roughly 100
inmates per 100,000 citizens to more than 700 — consistently one of the
highest rates in the world. Though Americans make up about only 4.6
percent of the world’s population, American prisons hold 22 percent of
all incarcerated people."
The American prison system was carefully constructed.
It is intentionally punitive and lacking in attempts at rehabilitation.
Rural prisons serve as support for otherwise dead towns.
After a prisoner in Norway fails at rehabilitation there is the possibility of psychiatric hospitalization.
3
No comments:
Post a Comment