I have been looking. I have no idea how things will shake out short term.
I think the wheels should be coming off. The evidence is not in.
Krugman:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/opinion/krugman-the-optimism-cure.html?ref=opinion
"Mitt Romney is optimistic about optimism. In fact, it’s pretty much all
he’s got. And that fact should make you very pessimistic about his
chances of leading an economic recovery. As many people have noticed, Mr. Romney’s five-point “economic plan” is
very nearly substance-free. It vaguely suggests that he will pursue the
same goals Republicans always pursue — weaker environmental protection,
lower taxes on the wealthy. But it offers neither specifics nor any
indication why returning to George W. Bush’s policies would cure a slump
that began on Mr. Bush’s watch.
In his Boca Raton meeting with donors, however, Mr. Romney revealed his
real plan, which is to rely on magic. “My own view is,” he declared, “if
we win on November 6, there will be a great deal of optimism about the
future of this country. We’ll see capital come back, and we’ll see —
without actually doing anything — we’ll actually get a boost in the
economy.”
Are you feeling reassured?
In fairness to Mr. Romney, his assertion that electing him would
spontaneously spark an economic boom is consistent with his party’s
current economic dogma. Republican leaders have long insisted that the
main thing holding the economy back is the “uncertainty” created by
President Obama’s statements — roughly speaking, that businesspeople
aren’t investing because Mr. Obama has hurt their feelings. If you
believe that, it makes sense to argue that changing presidents would,
all by itself, cause an economic revival.
There is, however, no evidence supporting this dogma. Our protracted
economic weakness isn’t a mystery; it’s what normally happens after a
major financial crisis. Furthermore, business investment has actually recovered
fairly strongly since the official recession ended. What’s holding us
back is mainly the continued weakness of housing combined with a vast
overhang of household debt, the legacy of the Bush-era housing bubble.
By the way, in saying that our prolonged slump was predictable, I’m not
saying that it was necessary. We could and should have greatly reduced
the pain by combining aggressive fiscal and monetary policies with
effective relief for highly indebted homeowners; the fact that we didn’t
reflects a combination of timidity on the part of both the Obama
administration and the Federal Reserve, and scorched-earth opposition on
the part of the G.O.P.
But Mr. Romney, as I said, isn’t offering anything substantive to fight
the slump, just a reprise of the usual slogans. And he has denounced the Fed’s belated effort to step up to the plate.
Back to the optimism thing: It’s true that some studies suggest a
secondary role for uncertainty in depressing the economy — and
conservatives have seized on these studies, claiming vindication. But if
you actually look at the measures of uncertainty involved, they’ve been
driven not by fear of Mr. Obama but by events like the euro crisis and
the standoff over the debt ceiling. (O.K., I guess you could argue that
electing Mr. Romney might encourage businesses by promising an end to
Republican economic sabotage.)
You should also know that efforts to base policy on speculations about
business psychology have a track record — and it’s not a good one.
Back in 2010, as European nations began implementing savage austerity
programs to placate bond markets, it was common for policy makers to
deny that these programs would have a depressing effect. “The idea that
austerity measures could trigger stagnation is incorrect,” insisted
Jean-Claude Trichet, then the president of the European Central Bank.
Why? Because these measures would “increase the confidence of
households, firms and investors.”
At the time I ridiculed such claims as belief in the “confidence fairy.” And sure enough, austerity programs actually led to Depression-level economic downturns across much of Europe.
Yet here comes Mitt Romney, declaring, in effect, “I am the confidence fairy!”
Is he? As it happens, Mr. Romney offered a testable proposition in his
Boca remarks: “If it looks like I’m going to win, the markets will be
happy. If it looks like the president’s going to win, the markets should
not be terribly happy.” How’s that going? Not very well. Over the past
month conventional wisdom has shifted from the view that the election
could easily go either way to the view that Mr. Romney is very likely to
lose; yet markets are up, not down, with major stock indexes hitting
their highest levels since the economic downturn began.
It’s all kind of sad. Yet the truth is that it all fits together. Mr.
Romney’s whole campaign has been based on the premise that he can become
president simply by not being Barack Obama. Why shouldn’t he believe
that he can fix the economy the same way?
But will he get a chance to put that theory to the test? At the moment, I’m not optimistic."
There is no news from Europe.
I am happy to see these lands in the forest reserve.
It took a long time for me to realize the Adirondacks are a wilderness park
and not a wilderness.
Walk gently on the land. It does not soon forget.
http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/83963.html
The "service upgrade" is suspected to be a "phishing project"
AOL does not ask for account details. Respond at your peril.
COBRA is too expensive. I will sign up for Medicare.
Epsome makes satisfactory printers. Mostly I live without hard copy.
If you must have a permanent page run the HP result through a color Xerox.
Xerox prints are archival.
Hair is the least of my concerns.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment