Sunday, September 19, 2010

9/19/10 @ 9:30

Beating the "war drum" is never good.
So did Pan Am. Plans are not actions.
Winning is always the objective. Now, what is the game? Not this one.

  • TimesPeople recommended a user:

    Sep 18, 2010
    georgewoodbury

    • sig225 posted to Twitter an interactive graphic:

      Sep 18, 2010
      The Learning Machines

      “New York Times - (A history of) The Learning Machines - http://nyti.ms/b67zBb. (but not available on my iPad learning machine)”

"Flash" is a monster. Jobs will not invite it in.

"The blind leading the blind." I know not where I am. I know not where they are.
I know that if they lived like I do, the world would not be a better place. I am not willing to live as they do.

The fine words point towards pie in the sky. An objective if you need one. Let us try to get a next step. The immediate goal is for individuals to understand the individual situation, the steps that lead away from it and the price, both long and short term.
I cannot and would not if I could, decide for them what is better.
OK. I agree. There is lots of pressure to drink the Kool Ade.
Better would be the Noguchi in western Queens.

44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444


No surprise.
No great effort, just a next small step.
If expenditures exceed income the entity is crashing. Rupert Murdock has an agenda. It is not mine. I will not make it mine. I will not read the Post. I have given up the WSJ. I am selective with the Times. I feel little need to be neutral.
I have no need to be lied to.

How about that. Just more noise and not even original. Look up Adam Purple.

  • TimesPeople recommended an editorial:

    Sep 18, 2010
    The Secret Election

    Advocacy committees that are sucking in many millions of anonymous corporate dollars are making this the most secretive election cycle since the Watergate years.

Acting against "The Best Government Money Can Buy" is long past due.
Thomas Friedman suffers from fixed false ideas. China is Mercantile. They sell for cash. They do not buy.
The reviewer thinks Carr has it wrong. I think they both have it wrong.
The effect of the net is to allow concentration without distraction by what look like side issues. Very often the apparent side issue is the conclusive line of argument.

Bloomberg is a moderate. A conservative Jewish Democrat. An engineer turned news publisher turned politician turned republican in pursuit of his duty to fix the world. Joe Liberman went wrong in this course but Bloomberg has not done so yet. I do not get to vote in his elections.
I trust that the politicians got it wrong. What is the next small step. The grand goal set is not even desirable. Who are the right people to save from population collapse? There are real limits to growth. We may not have found them yet. I think we have and are in denial.
"This is going to really hurt."

The problem seems to be a confusion in what is under test. The "double blind" test protocol is not required in safety testing. I will get through the article and confirm this.

I am very tired of attempts to "game the system". The FDA has a procedure for most situations. Why not ask them what to do here? I seem to remember them calling off tests and administering the drug across the board in other diseases.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)